CS
CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 beat Street across the board: revenue $1.98B vs $1.81B consensus, EPS $0.276 vs $0.055 consensus, and EBITDA $163M vs $116M consensus; company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was $186M including a $46M positive metal price lag, implying stronger underlying performance and a clear headline beat. [1]* Values retrieved from S&P Global
- Guidance maintained: FY 2025 Adjusted EBITDA (ex-metal lag) $600–$630M and Free Cash Flow >$120M; longer-term 2028 targets unchanged at $900M Adjusted EBITDA (ex-metal lag) and $300M FCF.
- Packaging outperformed; muscle Shoals improvement and price/mix helped offset auto and specialty weakness; A&T and AS&I were impacted by Valais flood-related costs and aerospace/TID softness.
- Tariffs are a fluid headwind/offset mix; management estimates ~$20M 2025 gross headwind from Canadian extrusions before mitigation, while local-for-local positioning, price actions, and scrap dynamics present opportunities.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong packaging performance: P&ARP Adjusted EBITDA rose 25% YoY to $60M on higher packaging shipments (+9% YoY in North America) and improved Muscle Shoals operations, with favorable price/mix.
- Company-level beat and cash discipline: Net income rose to $38M (vs $22M), operating cash flow was $58M, and share buybacks totaled 1.4M shares for $15M.
- Management confidence and discipline: Guidance maintained despite macro uncertainty; continued focus on Vision 25 cost program and commercial/capital discipline. “We remain focused on strong cost control, free cash flow generation and commercial and capital discipline.”
What Went Wrong
- Aerospace/TID softness and flood impacts: A&T Adjusted EBITDA fell 14% YoY to $75M on lower shipments and unfavorable mix; Valais flood had ~$4M A&T and ~$6M AS&I negative impacts in Q1.
- Automotive weakness in both regions: Automotive shipments decreased and AS&I Adjusted EBITDA halved to $16M on lower auto and extrusions volumes; ongoing end market weakness flagged.
- Tariff headwinds: Section 232-related extrusions into U.S. from Canada ~+$20M gross cost headwind in 2025 before mitigation; Q1 impact >$1M.
Financial Results
Consolidated performance vs prior quarters (oldest → newest)
Note: Q3 2024 was reported under IFRS in euros; Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 under U.S. GAAP in USD.
- Values retrieved from S&P Global
Q1 2025 actual vs Wall Street consensus (S&P Global)
- Values retrieved from S&P Global
Company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was $186M and includes $46M positive non-cash metal price lag; consensus/actual EBITDA from S&P likely excludes metal lag.
Segment performance (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
Product line shipments and revenue (Q1 2025)
KPIs and balance sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Constellium delivered solid results… despite continued demand weakness… and some lingering impacts from the flood… We repurchased 1.4 million shares for $15 million… leverage at 3.3x.”
- CEO on tariffs: “Tariffs remain a very fluid situation… we believe it presents opportunities for Constellium, and comes with some costs.”
- CFO on segments: “A&T… volume headwind of $20M… price/mix headwind $16M… costs tailwind $25M.”
- CFO on packaging: “Packaging shipments increased 9%… Muscle Shoals improved… price/mix tailwind $9M.”
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs cadence: ~$20M gross 2025 headwind from Canadian extrusions is expected to be fairly even quarterly before mitigation; one customer already agreed to full pass-through.
- Scrap spreads: Spot improved modestly by quarter-end; contracted H1 spreads still tight; guidance includes current scrap assumptions.
- Packaging/mix: Muscle Shoals improvement supports higher can sheet; price/mix uplift driven by end-stock mix.
- Aerospace: Destocking and supply chain challenges continue; defense/space healthy; near-term choppiness expected.
- European defense: Early signs of demand; potential ramp tied to execution of increased defense spending.
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 results exceeded consensus on revenue, EPS, and EBITDA: revenue $1.979B vs $1.808B; EPS $0.276 vs $0.055; EBITDA $163M vs $116M. Company Adjusted EBITDA was $186M including a $46M positive metal price lag, which consensus likely excludes; this drove the headline beat. * Values retrieved from S&P Global
- Coverage depth: EPS estimates count was low (1), revenue estimates (3), indicating limited analyst coverage and potentially larger surprise magnitude. * Values retrieved from S&P Global
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Broad beat with guidance maintained: Strong Q1 print and unchanged FY25/FY28 targets signal execution despite macro/tariff noise.
- Packaging strength offsets auto/specialty softness; operational improvements at Muscle Shoals and favorable price/mix underpin segment resilience.
- Tariff impacts quantified and mitigated: ~$20M extrusions headwind being offset by pass-throughs, local-for-local advantage, and price actions; net opportunities remain.
- Metal price dynamics supportive: Positive $46M metal price lag boosted Q1 Adjusted EBITDA; scrap spreads may gradually ease later in 2025.
- Balance sheet/liquidity intact: $800M liquidity, net debt $1.826B, leverage 3.3x with trajectory to trend down by year-end; buybacks continue.
- Segment mix matters: A&T and AS&I near-term choppy on aerospace/TID/auto, but defense/space and eventual supply chain normalization provide medium-term recovery optionality.
- Flood recovery largely behind: Valais operations resumed with lower cost structure, implying margin tailwinds as mix normalizes.